"pre-existing antibodies or T-cell responses against coronaviruses seem to protect against infection, not just the outcome of infection" What exactly does this mean and, if true, why were infection rates so high in NY ?
-
-
-
Immunity is age dependent. If we protect the low-risk young, through e.g. school closures, but not the high-risk elderly, sending infected individuals to nursing homes, then there will be many deaths. Very sad.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I think he’s overlooking change in social behavior. People don’t get their act together until the deaths are up close and personal.
End of conversation
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Or it’s simply social behavior. People don’t change their behavior until the deaths are local. In NYC in Feb while Italy was starting to burn, everyone was just coughing into the air on the street/subway/offices, and telling me it’s not here...
End of conversation
-
-
-
@SunetraGupta with an "e"Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This interview of Prof.
@SunetraGupta is so interesting! It’s so broad in the way it covers the whole aspect of this huge issue - and its inappropriate political answers - we have been facing for months now.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a new pandemic. There Risks are chronic heart disease, lung problems and nerve/brain problems. Herd immunity is not worth the risk, until we know more. You don't play with people's lives. People aren't statistics on a piece of paper
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.