BY FAR. As in, this is not even close. Not by a long shot. There are not two sides. It's not a debate. But suddenly the "listen to the science" left doesn't care.https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/506640-cdc-director-keeping-schools-closed-poses-greater-health-threat-to-children?userid=247939 …
-
-
Thanks, and super. This was released in early April. So the “experts” knew, like you, who needed protection and yet NY and other blue cities did the exact opposite believing beds would be filled by the young and thus pile the elderly back into NH. Early on it was pushed by 1/3
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Experts that children would infect adults. At that time I wondered why put children in then with grandparents. Did experts know early on children were not the threat to the elderly? It is said now that most infected at home. So using me as example, today I ventured out 2/2
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I am high risk. Aggressive cancer and over 65, although oddly in very good shape. My son does most of the shopping keeping me home. Yet he could get virus and pass it on to me anyway as he is out and about a lot. Entire family would need to stay home to protect me? 3/3
-
High-risk elderly are protected through self-isolation, with food delivered, meeting relatives outdoors at a distance, until we either have a vaccine or the pandemic dies down as younger low-risk individuals acquire immunity.
- Show replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.