If you can't tell the difference between misogyny and satire you should probably stick to previous trade in lads' mags
-
-
-
It was just "bantz" right?
-
Have you ever tried speaking English ? Some people say it helps ...
-
You're a writer? Try keeping up with new words https://en.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/bants …
-
Sad little man
-
You lose. Now bugger off
-
Here's a word for you (you may need to look it up). Onanist. It describes you rather well.
-
Beat you to it. I've been calling myself a wanker for years, Tim. Even in the Guardianhttps://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/26/wanker-porn-epidemic-editor-loaded-sex-consent …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Irrelevant thread. The right are winning & the liberal left are on the run. Good times.
-
Which makes the thread anything but irrelevant
-
Thread reinforces that reality. These people have lost the argument. Flailing around with increasingly bizarre assertions.
-
You've just proved why the thread isn't irrelevant
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
but I thought you believe in freedom of speech
-
I 100% respect the right of all cartoonists/humorists (inc Charlie Hebdo, etc) to publish >
-
What I love here is this is in no way seen as misogynistic by anybody on Left who'd usually >
-
ie - any criticism of
#Hillary was misogyny . -
dunno who that’s aimed at. But no I don’t believe that.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
interesting you automatically think that's sodomy...
-
Interesting you think it isn't. Catholic?
-
I'm no expert but I believe it's possible to enter a woman's vagina from behind. Catholic more missionary, no?
-
I'm pulling the ripcord on this thread now in case it's used against me later in life. Haha :)
-
fair enough
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.