Seems a bit odd to put this problem on how jurors answer the voir dire questions and not on what is asked and how it's interpreted by judges and lawyers.
-
-
-
What I'm writing about are strikes for cause, done by the judge. What attorneys do is irrelevant. So, I'd like jurors to consider the ramifications of their answers since many judges don't allow them to adequately explain before excusing them.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.