No penalty whatsoever for the DA? This has to change. How do we change that, Menschel?
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The prosecutor believed that she had followed the law and the discovery order. She made a mistake not realizing that her interview with...
-
..which were not recorded, or written, needed to be memorialized in writing and turned over to the defense. This is simply a training issue.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If you read the opinion it will become clear that the evidence of the defendant's guilt is quite strong. He will be re-tried and convicted.
-
Which begs the question, why bother withholding evidence?
-
Read the opinion. The information was information that the prosecutor learned first hand from a witness. There was no recording or writing.
-
It's behind a paywall. Doesn't matter if there's no recording or writing. If it's info received and falls under Brady, t has to be disclosed
-
I'm sorry. That is not true. Brady requires the disclosure of exculpatory information. This was inculpatory information. Thus, the confusion
-
Exculpatory, mitigating, or impeachment. Not just exculpatory.
-
Correct. The opinion is not behind a paywall. Just the poorly written news article.
-
What's the Style
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.