Stop wasting twitter bandwidth and our time. You have no credibility on this issue because of the $600k you took from ISPs.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Confusion? Lobbyists paid you $700,000 to push to kill it. There is no confusion.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
$600,999.00 $600,999.00 $600,999.00 $600,999.00 $600,999.00 $600,999.00 $600,999.00 $600,999.00 I can't hear you. $600,999.00 $600,999.00 $600,999.00 $600,999.00
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The vast majority of voters, regardless of party affiliation, disagreed with your effort to repeal the FCC’s Broadband Privacy rule and then you failed to get your industry donors on board to support your BROWSER bill to fix the problem you helped create.https://twitter.com/profcarroll/status/942941125266026496 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Marsha, you took $600,999.00 from ISP's. STUFU
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
How much does Comcast pay you?
-
Reports say she made $600,999.00 from telecom lobbyists.
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
What communication industry paid congressional mediocrity
@MarshaBlackburn (the Big Shill, both to pharma and comm.) in '16 to sell your internet privacy: Blackburn, Marsha Republican TN 7th $84,000 https://www.theverge.com/2017/3/29/15100620/congress-fcc-isp-web-browsing-privacy-fire-sale … https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.washingtonpost.com/amphtml/powerpost/marsha-blackburn-draws-campaign-fire-for-shepherding-bill-that-undercut-dea/2017/10/16/278ba74e-b1f3-11e7-a908-a3470754bbb9_story.html …Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Just stop Marsha. You're just another corporate shill who needs to make sure that you're giving your donors what they paid for.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I hate to "well, actually" here but yes . . . yes, that's exactly what it means. It also means ISPs can't shake down content providers. But you know all that; you're just paid to have no soul and lie a lot.
-
It is free and open for those who own the transmission paths to charge more with no guarantee they will be treated fairly. First come first served will be, sold to the highest bidder.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Do even know what you're talking about? The internet was Publicly Funded and belongs to the people, not the private sector.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You used this same bullshit about everyone being confused when you sold out and voted to let service providers sell browser history. And it’s still bullshit.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Then what is it we have now Marsha. Can you explain it to us? What will we have now that net neutrality has been repealed? Explain please since you seem to know the difference. Spoiler alert: she doesn't.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you're interested in hearing facts, from an expert on the situation, listen:http://directory.libsyn.com/episode/index/id/6046567 …
-
Thank you
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
"Many people are simply unaware that previously, their beloved ISPs were unable to fully serve them because of these regulations. Look at your cable provider -- don't you enjoy paying according to what you watch? Now imagine a chilling world where you had ALL the channels!"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.