Wow, missed that. Just awfulhttps://twitter.com/whiteclawmom/status/1223785662840741892 …
U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
You might suggest that it turned out there never such an attack, but you would be wrong. Go research the attack on Fort Dix in New Jersey. Back then, the Democrats would have been painted as giving aid and comfort to the enemy.
You know we didn't invade Iraq because of the threat it posed to us in terms of domestic terrorism, right? And that the plan to invade Iraq predated 9/11?
Apologetics for illegal wars are as boring now as they were in 2007.
Regrettably, people forget that there was no vote to go to war. There was only a vote to extend to the president certain powers if indeed such powers were justified. The president having abused these powers makes Pelosi at most guilty of a miscalculation.
Given that one of Al Qaedas three goals was the destruction of secular states like Iraq, the idea that Iraq was involved was absurd.
Either way, shouldn't we seek out leaders who are prescient and principled enough to recognize wrong before it is fashionable
It's not enough to seek them out. People need to care enough to go out and vote. If they don't, you can end up with wildcards. That's what we have now. A government populated by wild cards and funded by lobbyists. Go change that.
yes, attacks by Sunnis backed by Riyadh, the sworn enemy of Iraq and Iran?
The media standard back than. State media organs of war.pic.twitter.com/1iD5rxA4sC
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.