How about this:
If the Senate discusses calling witnesses, and Adam Schiff continues demanding we block questions and testimony on the whistleblower... then Adam Schiff should testify
Conversation
This is about the House not affording fair processes we all expect would be granted to all people. This is expected by all citizens, no matter party or affiliation would expect the House be required to follow fair & reasonable process and rules of evidence.
The House abuse
1
2
This Tweet is unavailable. Learn more
By Pelosi's standard, he was never impeached, since you can't have an impeachment without the key witnesses and documentation. So good news everyone: nothing has happened at all.
1
and you need to change your description of Eric to WhistleFraudster since he wasn't a real Whistleblower.
He already should be sent home for lying to Congress and the People!
WE WANT THE WHISTLE BLOWER.
How can you make a judgment based on the credibility of the invisible man?
How.
A person's credibility defines how serious you take their word, because this whole FREAK SHOW is based on hear say!
I'm afraid the Democrats will push America into war.
1
1
He is a fact witness and should testify under oath either way.
1









