You are saying Steven Crowder can make jokes (and he can). Carlos can make jokes back and complain if he wants. Just as Steven can complain too. You are not allowed to determine who is allowed to say what. I don't see why you seem to believe you can. That is censorship.
-
-
Replying to @TheSpookyScott @MarcWeinstein2 and
Steven can go to YouTube about Carlos as well and he has. No reason to silence either. Since when did jokes or being a crybully make need of sensorship?
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheSpookyScott @NealEason and
About the same time that Carlos decided to be a crybully to try to censor Crowder. But notice, Steven has gone to YouTube about Carlos, yet they do NOTHING about Carlos. But the instant Carlos opens his mouth, Crowder is harmed by YouTube?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarcWeinstein2 @NealEason and
Well you have given me some time to think on this. I looked at Steven's response. I have looked at other YouTuber's responses. I have concluded that this is by no means censorship. That is Steven's view, but it isn't true. That simply fired him. He can still make videos. He isn't
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheSpookyScott @MarcWeinstein2 and
Let me get this straight: You are mad that Steven got demonetized, but you are also mad Carlos didn't? You support censorship, just not against Steven clearly.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheSpookyScott @NealEason and
I'm upset that Crowder was harmed for making jokes, while YouTube did NOTHING about Carlos, despite the fact that they say stuff OFF YouTube can get people in trouble, yet his calls for violence were met with silence from them.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MarcWeinstein2 @NealEason and
And you have a right to be upset. No doubt. Honestly, I can't say they did the right thing for sure and my opinion has changed drastically on this. The problem is YouTube is not responsible for what happens on Twitter. Unfortunately, that is the case.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheSpookyScott @MarcWeinstein2 and
They did nothing because they can't do anything. As unfair as it is (I certainly disagree with it) it is the truth.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheSpookyScott @MarcWeinstein2 and
It is a 2019 problem I think needs to be addressed certainly. It is honestly a hard and confusing situation which is why either decision YouTube makes can be justified in different ways. I think personally Carlos should also be demonetized. However, they...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @TheSpookyScott @MarcWeinstein2 and
can't really cite tweets as reasons and they have that choice to make on their own. No one requires any action they do.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
Uhm...dude? They do mention stuff that threatens or harasses people on or off YouTube. Carlos clearly violates that policy.pic.twitter.com/49Ww1zimn8
-
-
Replying to @MarcWeinstein2 @NealEason and
Thank you! Yes, you are correct then. They could (and I think should) demonetize Carlos. However, that isn't censorship either.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 24 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.