Conversation

1. Topography over timelines Gardens are organised around contextual relationships and associative links; the concepts and themes within each note determine how it's connected to others.
Image
1
27
2. Continuous growth Gardens are never finished, they're constantly growing, evolving, and changing. What you publish is always open to revision and expansion. It's designed to evolve alongside your thoughts.
Image
1
28
3. Imperfection & learning in public Gardens are imperfect by design. They don't hide their rough edges or claim to be a permanent source of truth. They're more coherent than chat feeds, but less polished than a blog post โ€“ in between chaos streams and cultivated performance
Image
2
47
4. Playful, personal, and experimental Gardens are non-homogenous by nature. You can plant the same seeds as your neighbour, but you'll always end up with a different arrangement of plants. No two gardens are alike, and we should treat them as a personal, experimental play space
Image
1
26
5. Intercropping and content diversity Gardens are not just a collection of interlinked words. Podcasts, videos, diagrams, illustrations, interactive web animations, academic papers, tweets, rough sketches, and code snippets should all live and grow in the garden.
Image
1
31
Replying to
๐Ÿ™Œ #5 and #6 are the ones that feel most lacking in the existing knowledge-management tools out there, which is exactly why we started building @understory_coop. Your digital garden (and the way you write about them) has always been a huge inspiration!