Conversation

Aengus McMillin
@aengusmcmillin
Might be missing your point, but unclear on why this matters. Most digital gardens are websites. I'm just talking about a garden with a combination of ownership with roam style automatic interconnectedness. E.g. link to [[Books]] and see some combo of yours and others Books pages
2
Ian 👨🏼‍💻
@_jonesian
Im interested in how web mentions could connect digital gardens and such but filtering out noise is definitely the hard part.
2
3
Aengus McMillin
@aengusmcmillin
Yeah, I don't think this could be a super broad thing, it would probably have to be based on pre-existing subcommunities that want to share a space. I would think one or two dozen people at the maximum. You would need to know that every single person there is high signal to noise
1
3
Maggie 🔜 visting SFO 🇺🇸
@Mappletons
+1! Pre-approved collection of gardeners with exclusive access to communal contribution space. I really hope this format replaces the 20 slack groups, 6 discords, and 4 disqus forums I'm trying to keep track of... Cozy web is so broken. Need better gardening tools.
3
13
Maggie 🔜 visting SFO 🇺🇸
@Mappletons
One might even say our whole web ecosystem seems to be the outcome of a bunch of undirected stumbling around by millions of single actors not coordinating with one another 😁 Might led to something good eventually, but this toddler phase is such a clusterfudge ha
1
6
Maggie 🔜 visting SFO 🇺🇸
@Mappletons
It's a good one – the slightly more kosher / publically palatable alternative to clusterfuck. I like the weight of clusterfuck more, but I'm learning to make space for people who aren't into expletives as much. I'm pretty pro-expletives though, ha.
1
7