Conversation

I was spending way too much time on emoji lol * Growing and tending to community * "post-webpack" metaframeworks * Rust * The idea that JAMStack and Serverless are the same thing * The JAMLess stack (yikes) * What the tools for authoring and publishing digital gardens look like
Quote Tweet
I'm currently excited about: 🧠 Second Brains πŸ’… Product Design πŸ‘©πŸ»β€πŸ« Instructional Design πŸ§‘πŸΎβ€πŸš€ User Experience βš›οΈ State Management 🍬 CSS What are you learning these days?
Show this thread
1
26
In my head, this looks like a wiki. Where you can add topics and update them. Is this in the ball park?
3
1
It's interesting because my personal digital garden contains a LOT of proprietary information, not so much mine because I'm not concerned about that so much, but other people's that it's important to not "leak". so I can't just be fully open. It's a tough one.
1
2
the idea of a "wiki" is tainted because it just means "Wikipedia" to most folks. I don't think the ownership problem is inherent to "wiki" but just the mental framework of an overused/abused term ie blog, jamstack, wiki etc
1
2
I love the format of web mentions / interlinked personal sites to help solve the ownership issue. "Collective notes" on a single topic, but with multiple authors so that the notes can show up in everyone's personal digital gardens. With bidirectional links (obvs).
1
6
I definitely think that if there is a collective that decides to publish together (webring, whatever we call it), the centralized point of entry is important (in addition to the spokes). I've been mulling this format for the party-corgi community partially in newsletter format
1
3
I'm a fan of "curated confluence nodes" So the PCN is a curated node, but it's not a "hub" or central authority. I think any "official" central authority is in pagination land :) technically a [[Confluence Node]] would be a "hub" in the graph…
1
3
Show replies