U tweetove putem weba ili aplikacija drugih proizvođača možete dodati podatke o lokaciji, kao što su grad ili točna lokacija. Povijest lokacija tweetova uvijek možete izbrisati. Saznajte više
A while back I made a Discord server, but got tied up with real life stuff and couldn't put in the time to moderate it. When I came back it had gotten super toxic, but the toxic members were also smart and extremely active. 1/?
![L⁷~ [s/h]](https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/1223271807500857346/uz23Y7hH_normal.jpg)
I felt I was choosing between having an active server and having a welcoming server. Eventually I settled on just mass-banning all the toxic members (about 95% of the active users). To my surprise, within a week the server was significantly more active. 2/?
Turns out, the toxic users weren't the smartest or most active, they just made everyone else feel uncomfortable. Was very surprising how quickly things improved, and It didn't kill the server like many warned it would. Was a valuable lesson that I imagine applies offline too. 3/3
Question: smart as in intelligent/knowlegadable about the server topic, or smart as in being assholes without technically breaking any rules (or both).
The former.
As an IT Manager, I have learned that nothing will kill the moral of a department faster than toxic people. Sometimes, no matter smart they are, it is just best to get rid of them.
No. Every time it is better to get rid of them. No matter how "smart" or "indispensable" they seem to be.
It's almost like pruning out the bad people gives room for good to flourish. Hmm. But did you consider how mad it would make the toxic people?
Sounds like an added bonus to me
100% when you refuse to boot the toxic people, in a sense you are allowing the toxic people to boot the non-toxic people
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.
