McGilchrist's brain hemisphere model
+
buddhist concept of impermanence
thread!
(CC @_awbery_, @Meaningness)
-
-
These useful oversimplifications are, in large part, what the left hemisphere is *for*; they are necessary for being able to usefully count things, plan, talk about anything (before it's gone) etc. However, fixated as true, they are illusion & confusion.
Prikaži ovu nit -
So it seems like the shift from the left hemisphere's perspective being primary to the right hemisphere's perspective being primary is core to the shift that recognizes impermanence and the other buddhist structures. The implications of this...https://twitter.com/Malcolm_Ocean/status/1119364942161903616 …
Prikaži ovu nit -
eg "Tanha", usually translated as "desire" or "craving", is described below left (by Romeo Stevens) as "zooming in" or "grasping". Lo: these are left-hemisphere moves! https://twitter.com/Malcolm_Ocean/status/1136688724828459008 …pic.twitter.com/Snutd3kzqK
Prikaži ovu nit -
For more connections between brain hemispheres & buddhism, check out this thread
I am hardly an expert on either subject, but I seriously think that for people orienting towards awakening, McGilchrist is one of the most valuable resources for View 
https://twitter.com/Malcolm_Ocean/status/1128317947548708865 …
Prikaži ovu nit
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.



Turn your to-do list into a today list:
perspectives have truth (ie map-territory correspondence)
Yet: "everything changes but we can usefully pretend some things don't" seems more true than the reverse.
(Similarly "everything is interconnected but we can usefully pretend things are separate")
