Indeed. And even if they guarantee why should @US4AfghanPeace assume that it's a permanent guarantee.
One of the conditions is that the Taliban has to assure to cut links with foreign terrorists & do not let them attack US (and its) interests outside #Afghanistan!
Who could guarantee that the Taliban would implement this condition? #Pakistan?https://twitter.com/US4AfghanPeace/status/1157352611240189953 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No its completely lies and not ture, US troops are running from Afghanistan and want to leave this nation alone. Anywany We afghans are not wooried, but the experiment of 1980 would be repeated.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It means they can keep killing Afghans ?
-
Of course they can, one American Life matters more than hundreds from other nations.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The United States itself formed a precedent by not following through on responsibilities it owed to the Afghan conflict/fasad by failing on its role as one of the guarantors in the Geneva accords. The last is not the past and dark days are to follow particularly relating to FATA
-
This, while acknowledging the fact that power has its own dynamics, chief among which is the notion that ‘might is right’ at all concerned levels and connected players! It most certainly is a sorry state of affairs
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.