No-true-inconsistency: Whatever was chosen was desired, so any inconsistency is due to a mistaken observation or unobserved factors.
-
-
Replying to @MakerOfDecision
No-true-fallacy: Any fallacy is an indication of misunderstanding; if it were logically flawed, the speaker wouldn't have said it.
1 reply 1 retweet 1 like -
Replying to @MakerOfDecision
what about saying things that are logically flawed, but have game theoretic utility if the said thing is taken as true?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @ultimape
MakerOfDecision Retweeted MakerOfDecision
Are you, perhaps... disagreeing with me?https://twitter.com/MakerOfDecision/status/847106373938761730 …
MakerOfDecision added,
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ultimape
Are you signalling charitability, or misunderstanding? Either way, I blame you. (No-true-nonzero-inferential-distance?)
8:40 AM - 29 Mar 2017
1 reply
0 retweets
1 like
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.