No-true-inconsistency: Whatever was chosen was desired, so any inconsistency is due to a mistaken observation or unobserved factors.
-
-
Replying to @MakerOfDecision
No-true-identity: Any self-chosen identity is signalling, not true identification - but if challenged it means whatever the chooser claims.
1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @MakerOfDecision
No-true-argument: Any claimed disagreement is a fault of the other side because, by Aumann agreement, if they were rational we'd agree.
1 reply 2 retweets 0 likes
No-true-nonsignalling: Any actions, interpreted properly, are signalling.
Survival needs? Signalling self-preservation.
cc: @robinhanson
8:37 AM - 29 Mar 2017
0 replies
0 retweets
0 likes
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.