No-true-inconsistency: Whatever was chosen was desired, so any inconsistency is due to a mistaken observation or unobserved factors.
-
-
No-true-argument: Any claimed disagreement is a fault of the other side because, by Aumann agreement, if they were rational we'd agree.
-
No-true-nonsignalling: Any actions, interpreted properly, are signalling. Survival needs? Signalling self-preservation. cc:
@robinhanson
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.