Most heuristic decisions are sub-optimal. That's OK, as long as the heuristic is avoided in cases where it is near-pessimal.
These multi-polar contexts are exactly where betting, or at least making clear claims to evaluate is useful. (See; https://weird.solar/inevitable-bets-versus-useful-bets-3182c6890aea … )
-
-
In high-stakes contexts, public attempts at improving calibration can be used malevolently. (Especially in real conflict with outgroups.)
-
Anyway, these problems are hard. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ (But don't ignore that it's hard, or pretend that there is a simple way out of the bind.)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.