@VesselOfSpirit @MakerOfDecision yeah if there's one thing NRx fundamentally doesn't do, it's use "authoritarian" as a term of abuse
-
-
Replying to @admittedlyhuman1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
-
Replying to @MakerOfDecision
@MakerOfDecision@admittedlyhuman@VesselOfSpirit Also, how is it a devastating critique of anything? It's mostly ad hominem.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FrameOfStack
@FrameOfStack@admittedlyhuman@VesselOfSpirit The premise is sociopathic; not ad-hominem to say the idea, not the adherent, is sociopathic.4 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MakerOfDecision
@MakerOfDecision@admittedlyhuman@VesselOfSpirit Oh, well, p sure nrx is aware that the idea is sociopathic? Doesn't chnge th pro argument?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @FrameOfStack
@FrameOfStack@MakerOfDecision@admittedlyhuman@VesselOfSpirit Wait, the argument is that despite being sociopathic, they'd want to do it?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MakerOfDecision
@MakerOfDecision@FrameOfStack@VesselOfSpirit reversed sociopathy is not compassion1 reply 2 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @admittedlyhuman
@MakerOfDecision@FrameOfStack@VesselOfSpirit let's do the correct things and not worry about what the mentally ill would do in our shoes1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @admittedlyhuman
@admittedlyhuman But you're arguing values; you justify them on the level of preferences. Outcomes aren't correct, they are preferred.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MakerOfDecision
@MakerOfDecision ??? original claim seemed positive to me, not normative2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
@admittedlyhuman The claim was positive; the decision to prefer the outcome, however, would be normative.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.