@MakerOfDecision this sounds like a critique of libertarianism instead
@FrameOfStack @admittedlyhuman @VesselOfSpirit The premise is sociopathic; not ad-hominem to say the idea, not the adherent, is sociopathic.
-
-
@MakerOfDecision@admittedlyhuman@VesselOfSpirit Oh, well, p sure nrx is aware that the idea is sociopathic? Doesn't chnge th pro argument? -
@FrameOfStack@MakerOfDecision@admittedlyhuman@VesselOfSpirit Wait, the argument is that despite being sociopathic, they'd want to do it? - 8 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@MakerOfDecision@admittedlyhuman@VesselOfSpirit Seems like a case where the object-level question ("is it true") has been left alone -
@FrameOfStack@admittedlyhuman@VesselOfSpirit True/False don't apply. Liking chocolate isn't "true" - preferring sociopathy isn't "false." - 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
@MakerOfDecision@FrameOfStack@admittedlyhuman@VesselOfSpirit Please untag Us from this thread.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@MakerOfDecision@FrameOfStack what does it mean to say an idea is sociopathic if not that it's the sort of idea a sociopath would have? -
@MakerOfDecision@FrameOfStack ideas do not feel, so they are not expected to feel appreciation for social norms the way humans are - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.