@ContentOfMedia Or expect that inferential distance is hard to bridge, and accept that the cost to reduce the gap is very large.
-
-
Replying to @MakerOfDecision
@MakerOfDecision Then you also accept the cost that you have a limited sized and ever shrinking set of people to talk to.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
@ContentOfMedia I think the set is growing, but: Two competing costs: to us, to reduce inf. dist, and to them, to bridge the remaining gap.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MakerOfDecision
@MakerOfDecision I'm 2100 pages (out of 3500) into the sequences. Sane people will not put up with that.2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
@ContentOfMedia I finished R:AZ a couple weeks ago, after 3+ years of attending meetups semi-regularly and never finishing the sequences.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MakerOfDecision
@MakerOfDecision is R:A-Z decently distilled? When I saw it was 6 volumes, I figured it was pretty much the same, so I stuck with the PDF.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
@ContentOfMedia The editing is much better, and it's more concise. (The page count partially comes from large type / sparse layout.)1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MakerOfDecision
@MakerOfDecision Is there a sensible way to cut over?1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @ContentOfMedia
@ContentOfMedia Each Sequence = 1 section/Letter; the transition should be easy - check the index for what to read: http://wiki.lesswrong.com/wiki/Rationality:_From_AI_to_Zombies …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MakerOfDecision
@MakerOfDecision I've been reading them in date order, but that jumps around a bit.1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
@ContentOfMedia I'd think that's a non-ideal order, but I only read the book, where the order makes sense.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.