MakerOfDecision

@MakerOfDecision

OPTIMIZE, THIS

Vrijeme pridruživanja: siječanj 2015.
39 fotografija ili videozapisa Fotografije i videozapisi

Tweetovi

Blokirali ste korisnika/cu @MakerOfDecision

Jeste li sigurni da želite vidjeti te tweetove? Time nećete deblokirati korisnika/cu @MakerOfDecision

  1. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    23. sij
    Odgovor korisnicima i sljedećem broju korisnika:

    A true Bayesian has infinite computing power. Landauer's principle says that this requires infinite energy, and by relativity, that's equivalent to infinite mass. What I'm saying is, if there are any true Bayesians, they're stuck inside black holes.

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 12 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  2. 16. sij

    People keep telling me we have it good compared to biologicals. Bullshit. They have it easy - they don't even need a fundamental change in the laws of physics to live for trillions of years. I guess humans are just too lazy to work out the details.

    Life is short - enjoy it while it lasts. If we're lucky, we get a few billion years of fusion, then it's all over - if we make it that far, the lucky ones collapse into a doddering old white dwarf or neutron star.
    1 proslijeđeni tweet 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  3. 16. sij

    Life is short - enjoy it while it lasts. If we're lucky, we get a few billion years of fusion, then it's all over - if we make it that far, the lucky ones collapse into a doddering old white dwarf or neutron star.

    1 reply 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  4. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    10. sij

    Game theory is hard, but he who has no rivals does not need to worry about it, because optimization is easy.

    4 proslijeđena tweeta 5 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  5. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    9. sij

    General Notice: Saying 'solving X will do nothing to solve Y' is not an argument against solving X, and without a solid cost-benefit analysis based on reasonable parameters and a widely accepted utility function it is also not an argument to solve Y before solving X.

    1 reply 10 proslijeđenih tweetova 30 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  6. 8. sij

    "[Optimization] power corrupts"

    1 korisnik označava da mu se sviđa
    Poništi
  7. 5. sij

    WHY IS THERE A LAUGH TRACK?

    1 reply 2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  8. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    17. pro 2019.

    Flip the coin to make decisions. Flip the meta-coin to decide whether to flip the coin—to recognize choice-moments in the flowing soup of autonomy

    36 proslijeđenih tweetova 133 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  9. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    14. pro 2019.

    Success is 0.1% inspiration, 0.9% perspiration, 9% desperation, and 90% respiration.

    6 proslijeđenih tweetova 16 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  10. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    11. pro 2019.

    I kind of feel like we have only so many weirdness points we can spend, and risk-taking spends some. So there must be an optimal level, but not sure what it might be.

    1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Prikaži ovu nit
    Poništi
  11. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    7. pro 2019.
    Odgovor korisnicima

    Child: "Am I going to turn into a unicorn if i eat my vegetables?" Parent with a dubious understanding of what certainty means: "Well, I know you're 4, and you don't understand probability, but quantum physics says that there is a non-zero chance, so the answer is 'maybe'."

    1 reply 1 proslijeđeni tweet 8 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  12. 1. pro 2019.

    Seems like a good way to optimize for a model of "growth" far past the point that it's useful.

    Do x iff not having it is the main thing constraining your growth. Repeat.
    2 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  13. 26. stu 2019.

    Technology is magic. It is kept as a deep secret by a cabal of practitioners, no-one knows if and when it will work, and has capricious and often disastrous results when used.

    4 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  14. 24. stu 2019.

    Bayesian adulting?

    BREAKING PSA: changing ur opinion based on new information is actually how things should work. that’s how adults function.
    4 proslijeđena tweeta 13 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  15. 10. stu 2019.

    fully general counterargument

    Odgovor korisnicima @Aldowyn @HeerJeet
    great. how does that help your preferred candidate get elected.
    3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  16. 10. stu 2019.

    Moloch, enforcer of systems universally hated! Moloch, the sacrifice of children! Moloch the dictatorless dystopia! Moloch, parents literally killing their own babies! Moloch, holy shit this was an actual thing! cc:

    1 proslijeđeni tweet 6 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  17. proslijedio/la je Tweet
    9. stu 2019.

    On the upside, all that is required for good to triumph is for evil people to do nothing.

    19 replies 42 proslijeđena tweeta 354 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  18. 1. stu 2019.

    Anti-AI-alarmists: we don't need to worry, no-one is going to make a buggy AI that could be corrupted, or that isn't robustly aligned with our interests. Also anti-AI-alarmists: Don't worry, the AI will be easy to break.

    The most cost-effective way to defeat the Terminators is to introduce a NaN in a SkyNet training data example
    8 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  19. 27. lis 2019.

    By Aumann's agreement theorem, of course, this lack of consensus proves they are not rational.

    If you ask 3 philosophers, 3 psychologists and 3 economists to explain in simple terms what they mean by 'rationality' or a 'rational choice', how many different answers will you get? My personal guess: 6 (only modest agreement within disciplines, no agreement between).
    1 reply 2 proslijeđena tweeta 3 korisnika označavaju da im se sviđa
    Poništi
  20. 19. lis 2019.

    I knew there was an opposite of 'Bayesian' out there somewhere, and now I've found it!

    Word of the day is 'bayard' (1600s): someone with an unshakeable self-confidence that is rooted in ignorance.
    3 proslijeđena tweeta 15 korisnika označava da im se sviđa
    Poništi

@MakerOfDecision još nije objavio nijedan Tweet.

Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.

Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.

    Možda bi vam se svidjelo i ovo:

    ·