My latest: Protests are pretty much never seen as "civil," or protesters' tactics as socially acceptable, while they're happening. The neatly packaged versions exist only in retrospect.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/16/us/politics/us-protests-history-george-floyd.html …
-
-
Old polling data is also revealing. In 1961, 57% of Americans thought sit-ins and the Freedom Rides hurt the cause of integration. In 1964, the year after the March on Washington, 74% percent said mass demonstrations hurt the cause.https://news.gallup.com/vault/246167/protests-seen-harming-civil-rights-movement-60s.aspx …
Afficher cette discussion -
If we look solely at effectiveness, putting moral/philosophical considerations aside, there is no neat, consistent pattern to which types of protest work and which don't. History just doesn't support those narratives.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/16/us/politics/us-protests-history-george-floyd.html …
Afficher cette discussion -
Much more in the article, including insights from historians and political scientists who study what makes movements effective.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/16/us/politics/us-protests-history-george-floyd.html …
Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.