Maybe New Hampshire is an outlier, but Klobuchar's late surge there somewhat undermines this part of the case.https://twitter.com/MaggieAstor/status/1235631999173513217 …
-
NH has shown greater propensity to support women candidates; its entire governing slate (GOV, Senate, House) were women in 2014. but still think it's notable that these same voters rejected Buttigieg/Biden for Klobuchar. Undermines the general theory in real life.
Worth noting, certainly. But I disagree that one surge in one state — which, as you said, has shown greater propensity to support women, and where Buttigieg still finished ahead of Klobuchar — undermines the general theory in the face of opposing evidence elsewhere.
-
-
the other countervailing evidence is just how well Dem Congressional candidates did against men in the 2018 Congressional primaries. There may be more of an executive (vs. legislative) bias, but there are a whole lot of downballot data points that can't be ignored.
-
There is definitely evidence for more bias in executive races — lots of good research in that area by
@BLFF_org. Broadly, though, I think we're kind of making two separate arguments... 1/2 - 5 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.