“I’ve never seen anything like that on a presidential stage from a woman," @rtraister, who wrote the actual book on women's anger, told me. "It was mind-blowing."https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/19/us/politics/elizabeth-warren-debate.html …
-
-
Afficher cette discussion
-
There is real risk here, as both
@rtraister and@kdittmar noted. We're seeing some of it already, in tweets calling Warren "mean" or "nasty." But there's also upside: Warren had the most speaking time, and her best debate fundraising day ever.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/19/us/politics/elizabeth-warren-debate.html …Afficher cette discussion -
For many women, it was also just thrilling to see a woman onstage expressing that anger openly and unapologetically. "It was cathartic as hell to see a woman be angry and passionate and comfortable with her anger,"
@amandalitman said.https://www.nytimes.com/2020/02/19/us/politics/elizabeth-warren-debate.html …Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
She showed her a$$....no one likes angry, mean, gotcha candidates...she lied to America for years about who she was/is...she has no room to speak.
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
But was this too late?
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
-
-
My, my, how soon we forget 2016. When Hillary Clinton needed Elizabeth Warren's endorsement, EW waited so long in the process that her endorsement lost it's effectiveness. Liz wanted to be the first woman pres. Her end game was to manipulate the system and stab HRC in the back.
-
Some Democrats encouraged Warren to run in 2016 and she declined. Your claim is untrue.
- 2 réponses de plus
Nouvelle conversation -
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.