They have folks in many precincts tweeting pictures of the final alignment. They may be talking out of their Buttigieg, but they do have some data.https://twitter.com/MaggieAstor/status/1224564834295058437 …
-
-
En réponse à @GlennF
But you can't draw conclusions like this from an incomplete assortment of precincts.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @MaggieAstor
Absolutely, but he is not operating from zero data. I presume all the candidates have people texting photos and examining tweets of final alignments.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @GlennF @MaggieAstor
It’s 100% spin, but they’re going to justify it by saying they examined X precinct sheets.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @GlennF
They can justify it however they want! I'm pointing out that it's brazen spin.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @MaggieAstor
Big fan of your reporting, so I apologize if I am picking a nit. I was referring to “We don't know any of the results.” The campaigns know some! More than any of us. I don’t think they have statistically valid information—but we could be surprised still given their info gathering
2 réponses 0 Retweet 0 j'aime -
En réponse à @GlennF @MaggieAstor
Unrelated to this, I thought your piece on access for caucuses for people who have disabilities was fantastic.
1 réponse 0 Retweet 0 j'aime
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.