I wrote about this, and lots of other ways voters express implicit sexism, earlier this year.https://www.nytimes.com/2019/02/11/us/politics/sexism-double-standard-2020.html …
Afficher cette discussion
This is so blatant, it reads like a caricature of implicit bias. The undefined "something about her" you don't like. The "cold" perception. The focus on body language. It's textbook sexism and should depress the hell out of you no matter what you think of Warren's policies.https://twitter.com/jbouie/status/1191328373257252864 …
-
-
-
What this woman is saying about Warren is very similar to what one voter told me about Clinton — except the voter I spoke to had ultimately realized that her assessment was based on implicit sexism.
Afficher cette discussion -
“I actually heard so often that people didn’t like her and she was unlikable that I started to think, ‘I don’t know if I really like her so much,’” the voter told me. “I realized I had no reason why I didn’t like her.”
Afficher cette discussion -
And that's the crux of it. There are a hundred valid reasons to reject a candidate based on ideology, policy proposals, level of experience, etc. But if you're rejecting them based on vague feelings that you yourself cannot define or explain, maybe examine that more critically.
Afficher cette discussion
Fin de la conversation
Nouvelle conversation -
-
-
Good lord, the "Hilary Clinton clone" quote. Literally 0% true except they are both women, former Senators (and blonde, I guess).
Merci. Twitter en tiendra compte pour améliorer votre fil. SupprimerSupprimer
-
Le chargement semble prendre du temps.
Twitter est peut-être en surcapacité ou rencontre momentanément un incident. Réessayez ou rendez-vous sur la page Twitter Status pour plus d'informations.