Outdoors is better than indoors when considering the risk of infection by SARS-CoV-2. Dilution of aerosols outdoors & their removal via wind occurs much more easily outdoors than in a closed room especially if that room has no air filtration or active air exchange. *But* ... 2/
-
-
Show this thread
-
...that doesn't mean proximity to an infected person & time exposed to them aren't still really important. We need to keep our distance from others who may be infected and not spend too long indoors or near those outside our "bubbles". 3/
Show this thread -
Think about queues for lunch, ice cream or the shower. Distance is a great habit to keep up. It'll also help reduce our risk of getting any of the other 200 respiratory viruses /end
Show this thread
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I will take fresh air anytime over a stuffy room with no air currents.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The lake maybe more concerning.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Never understood the panic about beaches.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
ah yes, clearly this is very safe (and YES, I KNOW it is not in your country, but it is the argument of your headline, right?)https://twitter.com/Ariel__levy/status/1315671994709561344?s=19 …
0:15 -
This is quite a different picture. Our crowds are still in the context of physical distancing. These aren't.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
California's are paying a deadl5price because of "beaching"
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.