Do we have any new reports that confirm the R of 1.5-3.5 stated in this article? Is the Chinese study that said r 4 been debunked?
-
-
-
I haven't seen a debunking, no. I'd asked
@maiamajumder her thoughts as she's more expert than I here. - Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
-
-
Mild? When patients needs to be incubated and given oxygen? Put in ICU? Is that mild?
-
No but there are cases where that’s NOT the case.
- Još 9 drugih odgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
*breaking news*Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Why are they burning the corpses?
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
The success to control virus depends on the transmission way. If the virus can be easily transmitted people to people by droplets and during incubation period when there is no or mild symptoms - how it could be controlled in this global world? It’s the same how to control URTIs.
Hvala. Twitter će to iskoristiti za poboljšanje vaše vremenske crte. PoništiPoništi
-
-
-
Is there any evidence of limited asymptomatic transmission? The Swedish chief epidemiologist called on the NEJM authors to retract the German study, calling it terrible science. I have not seen anyone else criticize if.
-
Lancet has an article about it.
Kraj razgovora
Novi razgovor -
-
-
That's what is so deceptive with design of this virus. Under the radar because most r talking about "at least it isn't as deadly" it wants 2 live & reproduce at any cost! It's all about the numbers. Buying time
#coronavirus#nCoV19#2019_nCov#2019n_CoV#2019nCoV#pandemic2020 -
Conspiracy isn't fact.
- Još 1 odgovor
Novi razgovor -
Čini se da učitavanje traje već neko vrijeme.
Twitter je možda preopterećen ili ima kratkotrajnih poteškoća u radu. Pokušajte ponovno ili potražite dodatne informacije u odjeljku Status Twittera.