Today has generated a lot of questions and confusion. We know it hasn't been easy for everyone. Going forward, we'll be taking a closer look at our own harassment policies, with the aim to update them. Our thoughts and plans:https://yt.be/help/zxSq
-
-
Replying to @TeamYouTube
I don't understand this mindset. Why do you see creators as representative of your entire site as opposed to just representatives of themselves? You can't police people for being people if you want an open platform like you say you do. It's in the site's name, for Christ's sakes.
14 replies 26 retweets 833 likes -
Replying to @EyeofSol299 @TeamYouTube
They don't want to be an open platform, they want people to watch their videos. This isn't LiveLeak. They have to pay lip service to keeping toxic content off the platform or risk scaring away viewers and investors.
6 replies 0 retweets 61 likes -
Replying to @IanBurnette @TeamYouTube
Really? Because I don't remember having to sign an NDA or any contracts with YouTube to curate my content to their liking before making an account. If YouTube wants to curate the content on their platform so draconically, then they can't have a user upload feature at all.
2 replies 3 retweets 95 likes -
Replying to @EyeofSol299 @TeamYouTube
You had to agree to the ToS in order to open an account. That's a contract. Within that contract were a set of rules that you agreed to adhere to in order to continue having access to the platform.
11 replies 3 retweets 188 likes
That is openly admittedly by YouTube as being adhered to, but the goal post are then moved without warning? Huh.. what are you arguing?
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.