This is a real question mark of the civil service. The report references the poor behaviour in the department, when it came to work ethic, they've got to be prepared to have people in there that get the job done.
-
-
Näytä tämä ketjuKiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
Per norm we hear one side only-employees get to pile on .. Priti has to stay silent. Boris get to grips with these ‘independent advisers’ no former MPs or Civil servants from now on.
-
Let’s see a few of her subordinates that have shown her support? There are none? How odd.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Because she kept demanding that illegal and/or immoral actions were taken against refugees, asylum seekers, immigrants. Then she shouts, swears and tries to intimidate to get her way. She's not very bright. Surely IDS can recognise a fellow traveller in plain sight.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
Kiitos. Käytämme tätä aikajanasi parantamiseen. KumoaKumoa
-
-
-
No. She was trying to break rules and standards, and civil servants stood in her way. She couldn't command their respect and so she tried intimidation. That's who she is. And that's clearly who you are too.
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
-
-
In all three departments? Not what the report says. But, IDS is a faithful stooge.
-
Explain the deliberate lie told to Rudd by Rutnams staff over Windrush that she repeated in the house , which caused her to resign ? Alright in your book then ?
- Näytä vastaukset
Uusi keskustelu -
Lataaminen näyttää kestävän hetken.
Twitter saattaa olla ruuhkautunut tai ongelma on muuten hetkellinen. Yritä uudelleen tai käy Twitterin tilasivulla saadaksesi lisätietoja.