Maya Forstater

Oh yes, I understand that. I was trying to summarise. That detail is in the link I shared. But I still find it astonishing that there was a majority vote for this in the legal committee. And they do have support of the group of MNCs.

But maybe the legal committee doesn't really support it, maybe they expect it to fail to get votes?

Your context, about this being normal, helps me understand the counter proposal. Thank you Dina. But still I'm.surprised that there is any business support.

The other issue with the counter-proposal is that parent companies are not liable for their suppliers, but only those companies they directly control. So this wouldn't create liability for events like Rana Plaza, or abuses caused by Shell's suppliers in Ogoniland.

Isn't the main proposal also only for companies that are controlled? (i.e. as implied by 'parent company') -- it says can include suppliers where they are essentially controlled eg. they only have one customer, but not the broad supply chain responsibility you suggest?

i.e. Rana Plaza would be excluded from the original proposal also? Are the MNCs supporting the proposal or the counter proposal?

So, it is very surprising but the original proposal has the public support of 33 companies, and the Swiss group of MNCs endorsed the counter proposal.