. @judith_odi @ODIdev @FT argues the focus on secrecy in UK's Overseas Territories is misplaced, ignores their role in providing tax neutrality and protection from corrupt and unpredictable rule of lawhttps://twitter.com/ftcomment/status/994352710773338113 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Both, surely? BO residence for income, host country for e.g. cap gains? (Also, we can't do the maths for the BOs' country of tax residence because we can't see them (natch!))
Based on what the Capital Economics Report says on where the BOs are from it looks like most main places covered by TIEAs (China, UK, US, Canada, several EU countries) .... the largest gap is Russiahttps://twitter.com/MForstater/status/992793417611710464 …
-
-
Interesting (assuming accurate -
@CapEconomics decline to release any of their data or calcs :-) (1) values/geography by location of underlying assets pretty close to that by location of UBO [1 of 2] -
[2 of 2] It's surely disingenuous to lump China/HK together, as here: if most of that (33%) slice is HK, then no tax EOI (no CRS pair and no TIEA). Add Russia and we could easily be approaching 40-50% of BVI-held assets?pic.twitter.com/OufYcHVrP5
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.