. @judith_odi @ODIdev @FT argues the focus on secrecy in UK's Overseas Territories is misplaced, ignores their role in providing tax neutrality and protection from corrupt and unpredictable rule of lawhttps://twitter.com/ftcomment/status/994352710773338113 …
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I'm not convinced CRS means nothing in 1st col. Maybe for U.S. or European taxpayers, but e.g. around 1/2 of direct investment held via BVI co's is still in countries with no tax EOI with BVI at all: either bilat, MCAATM-on-request or CRS pairing. Maybe as CRS expands? [2 of 2]
Isn't the relevant set of agreements here between BVI & beneficial owners country(s) of tax residence? (i.e. not so much between BVI & host countries of FDI?) -- cf: Indonesia, Argentina above?
-
-
Thinking about the matrix a bit more -- which boxes are likely to be empty, which are logical combinationspic.twitter.com/9L1byL0ZJR
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Both, surely? BO residence for income, host country for e.g. cap gains? (Also, we can't do the maths for the BOs' country of tax residence because we can't see them (natch!))
-
Based on what the Capital Economics Report says on where the BOs are from it looks like most main places covered by TIEAs (China, UK, US, Canada, several EU countries) .... the largest gap is Russiahttps://twitter.com/MForstater/status/992793417611710464 …
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Plus a *big* issue for countries like India is round-tripping i.e. Indian tax authorities want to see whether 'foreign' investors via e.g. Mauritius companies are actually Indian taxpayers?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.