Dan Neidle's thread on @FinclSecrecyInd is essential reading. One professional in one country shld not be able to pick so many holes. All those who care if the index is fit-for-purpose index (incl. those designing, compiling, citing and funding) shld take the criticisms seriouslyhttps://twitter.com/DanNeidle/status/987261080807395328 …
-
-
Replying to @MForstater @FinclSecrecyInd
Tax Justice Network Retweeted Alex Cobham
As
@alexcobham says it seems there's quite a bit of ideological disagreement rather than error but response on the way, cheershttps://twitter.com/alexcobham/status/987331347306942465 …Tax Justice Network added,
Alex Cobham @alexcobhamReplying to @DanNeidle @TaxJusticeNetThanks Dan, appreciate all the time you've spent on this. At a first look, it seems there's quite a bit of ideological disagreement rather than error; and some where the methodology doc has the answer. But we'll take a good look and come back to you next week. Have a good wknd!1 reply 1 retweet 0 likes -
Financial Secrecy Index Retweeted Alex Cobham
As
@alexcobham says it seems there's quite a bit of ideological disagreement rather than error but response on the way, cheershttps://twitter.com/alexcobham/status/987331347306942465 …Financial Secrecy Index added,
Alex Cobham @alexcobhamReplying to @DanNeidle @TaxJusticeNetThanks Dan, appreciate all the time you've spent on this. At a first look, it seems there's quite a bit of ideological disagreement rather than error; and some where the methodology doc has the answer. But we'll take a good look and come back to you next week. Have a good wknd!1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes
The FSI sets out to be politically neutral and asks an empirical rather than an ideological question. I suspect Twitter is not the place for this discussion but its worth having, rather than dismissing.pic.twitter.com/ZIXKLxxlZ3
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.