Interesting. So what is the ‘transfer pricing’ done by multinationals to lower their effective tax rate across countries, irrespective of the general menchanism among govts, called?
-
-
Replying to @JonathanSaid1 @MForstater
There's a Danish idiom that roughly translates as "cherished child has many names" :) Transfer *mis*pricing, corporate tax avoidance, base erosion and/or profit shifting, illicit financial flows (which Maya loves), "tax dodging", aggressive tax planning, etc.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @phdskat @MForstater
Ok thanks. In a development context then, I think, the word transfer pricing is often misused. From 0 to 100, where would you say we are on effective regulation of these?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MForstater @phdskat
Thx. With regards to BEPS, if rentier companies shift profits enough to save on say $10m in a country like Sierra Leone or Liberia, that’s huge for those countries, even if most of the revenue losses from BEPS accrues to developed countries.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @JonathanSaid1 @phdskat
Yes. Agreed. Millions are significant (but don't imagine billion/trillions) and good pay back from developing regs & audit capacity (e.g. see work of
@ATAFtax)https://www.cgdev.org/blog/how-big-transfer-pricing-prize-development …1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @JonathanSaid1 and
But often misunderstood/inflated --> (1) there must be zillions https://www.cgdev.org/blog/inflated-expectations-about-mineral-export-misinvoicing-are-having-real-consequences-tanzania … and/ or (2) developing country issues w TP implementation used to argue for major rule change to intl tax system (may or may not be a good idea, but shouldn't be driven by wishful thinking)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Point taken on scale tho I think of tax revenue as pension scheme. Difference in returns in 40 years from adding $100 to your monthly contribution is huge. Also depends on econ structure of country. If based on extractives a few million dollars *each year* makes big difference.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Right. But no free lunch - current investment is based on how investors view post tax ROI & risk. TP enforcement raises effective tax rate --> consequences https://www.sbs.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Business_Taxation/Docs/Publications/Working_Papers/Series_18/WP1803_0.pdf … (I agree w u there is revenue potential particularly in extractives, & mileage in reducing risk)
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Personal pet peeve caveat to that paper (and others that focus on outright FDI): doesn't look at whether/how much of FDI 'lost' from TP enforcement is actually productive/useful investment. Not all FDI the same. (And we also don't know how/what kind of TP regs cause the effect)
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
Define 'productive/useful'.. :)
-
-
Exactly! :) Paper doesn't. I could take a stab of course (
@thesailaway_CPH tells me it's all about private capital formation), but I think at least it'd be useful if these types of considerations were, well, considered0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.