Ah, I knew there was a catch. As it is not on your website I guess it is not out yet?
-
-
Replying to @p_sfitz @ProfHoffer
Yes it’s on SSRN here: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3132538 … I just haven’t had time to blog it yet, but will!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
iain campbell Retweeted iain campbell
Will also enjoy reading.
@MForstaterhttps://twitter.com/iaincampbell07/status/983799953268060161?s=19 …iain campbell added,
iain campbell @iaincampbell07If we think it's hard to allocate value within groups of companies, or between platforms and different users, imagine how much harder with factors such as wages in unconnected biz, environmental stds, etc, let alone to tax.@MForstater@profchristians@DanNeidle@JudithFreedman https://twitter.com/ProfHoffer/status/983622505196916736 …1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @iaincampbell07 @p_sfitz and
In fact
@MForstater gave me some very helpful comments on an early draft of this paper. Nevertheless it is still a work in progress so I certainly appreciate feedback!2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @profchristians @iaincampbell07 and
Well I'm a terribly slow starter for reading things but I'll try!
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @p_sfitz @iaincampbell07 and
I posted today just for you. http://taxpol.blogspot.qa/2018/04/taxing-income-where-value-is-created.html …pic.twitter.com/8XoJtDueOk
2 replies 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @profchristians @p_sfitz and
Again more to read with interest. This looks more of a paradigm shift then CCCTB or FA, much more than CBCR. I suspect I will have all of the reactions already described!pic.twitter.com/QpeUCZcLK3
1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @iaincampbell07 @profchristians and
I've gotta say I'm still not convinced (although, like @_DavidQuentin 's piece it does make you think...) . This feels circular. Set a living wage figure - define wld only accept less if compelled What is it that compels them? The fact that the figure defined is not on offerpic.twitter.com/RtLxA05H2I
3 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @iaincampbell07 and
Then there is the problem that figure defined is so much higher than prevailing average wage (not just in that industry) - so by definition most people in the economy are working 'under compulsion' -- same approach to tax cld apply to all biz? ( but isnt this just taxing labour?)pic.twitter.com/iCW1LsjIix
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @iaincampbell07 and
I know its only an illustration but what is this industry where you can buy something for $5 in one country and sell it on for $105 in another without any additional costs and make a profit of $100 ??
pic.twitter.com/0BBadFOlJI
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
Then there is the question to what extent are Northern MNCs direct employers of low wage labour by subsidiaries (rather than in the supply chain). Not so much. e.g. this is data for US MNCs from BEA https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/e/2PACX-1vRSSYm5AZQm6Bm2Y0se4EVTYV0dlDgqNEc704ntWK5BsC4MvZHAFFffEN5dAWkcd6ugxWSbJA6aEXaQ/pubchart?oid=394200345&format=interactive …
-
-
Replying to @MForstater @profchristians and
Those figs look like expat labour? Maybe some dev economists can say if MNCs directly employ few local staff and instead mostly operate via ind local firms? Would poss be more flexible and avoid additional costs of direct employment.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @iaincampbell07 @profchristians and
No these are BEA figures for employment abroad by subsidiaries of US multinationals. 28 million people. Companies like Nike employ few manufacturing staff directly. Outsource production to contract factories.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 like
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.