... there's nothing wrong with taking an average over a heterogeneous population, nor can I believe you literary have no prior concerning the prevalence of bad practice.
God (who sounds a bit like @ali_readhead ) would tell us that all depends on commodity prices, costs etc… Lets assume there is profit shifting. Say the management fee should be cut in half and interest reduced by 3 percentage points. (Disclaimer: I just making these numbers up)
-
-
If we make these adjustments it raises pre tax profit by 70% over the lifecycle of the mine (i.e. if OO base case represents what the company declared and the adjusted case represents the true ALP it means 60% of profits were being shifted) (6/)
-
BUT the pattern of years of loss and profit doesn’t look all that different. This time there are 26 loss years, and the project become profitable a year earlier. So the answer in this case is there is a 4% prevalence of loss years due to profit shifting.pic.twitter.com/s66Uv8vTpJ
- 12 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.