Factchecking the Financial Secrecy Index (part III)) Poor Finland gets marked down for 'having bearer shares in circulation' . On this basis.pic.twitter.com/OpL2kbz6w6
Show this thread
UK seems to get marked down because Limited Partnerships (in England) are not included in the beneficial ownership (PSC) rules ? (even though they are not separate legal entities like LLP and SLPs)pic.twitter.com/gRCtVO9o2q
-
-
Does Denmark really have local filing requirements for CBCRs that disregard the OECD legal framework? (
@Wouterlips@phdskat ?) (.....this one seems like a really weird criteria for not being a secrecy jurisdiction)pic.twitter.com/PAwh8fcChe
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That is correct. An English LP or an English/Scottish general partnership is not an entity and cannot own anything in its own name. Hence no PSC requirement. Scottish LPs are entities and so (belatedly) there is a requirement.
-
Hence the statement in the report is wrong/misleading.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.