do you know if indicators for 17.1 have been agreed, and if so do they capture BEPs? On grey areas, where would you situate e.g. MNC tax planning that was internally estimated to have ~50% chance of being deemed legal if examined by courts?
-
-
-
maybe first I should ask about the prevalence of ~50% probability legal arrangements.
- 15 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Yes it probably was me :)
End of conversation
-
-
-
@DanNeidle I think the 50% comes from a PAC report which alleged all Big 4 firms did it. In fact this was the exchange.pic.twitter.com/IzVV0xKou4
-
It’s certainly correct you have to think the position is more confident than 50% before you file. The mistake is assuming a simple correlation between tax uncertainty and tax avoidance.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Saw a news article about an appointment to an EU committee on Finsbury Crime, evasion and AVOIDANCE. It's about associating a non crime with crimes in the minds of plebs - to change the rule of law!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
However seeing as the great and good indulge a lot in avoidance - how exactly are thry going to criticise it for the plebs without raining on their own parade!!!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Perhaps one day we will get laws against avoidance
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.