Which clearly isn’t the case for AMT Coffee. The transparency seems to come down to “trust us”.
-
I think thats a similarity rather than a difference. Most green/social niche voluntary schemes are trying to achieve wider change than just to the companies/ products they accredit i.e to push market or regulatory norms.
But struggle to see what's going on inside 
So report management processes & systems (not the stuff that matters).
None of this tackles the 
incentives driving non-compliance (in labour/environ)
So abuses persist.
But as Alice asks if those norms are purely process-based at some point have to check they translate to positive outcomes. Otherwise transparency norms for their own sake can be a 
on a 
. Challenge on 'fair tax' is whether we can judge 'fair'.
-
-
I think there can be non governmental accreditation which has legal backing (professions like law or medicine). But can't think of any that work by defining outcomes, eg a "good" doctor, as opposed to process eg "good" training. Outcomes are usually assessed separately.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.