Some thoughts on the @fairtaxmark which recently certified AMT coffee
https://fairtaxmark.net/amt-coffee-fair-tax/ … (1/10)
Show this thread
-
why do tax justice campaigners see publishing tax policy as a win? Isn't that privileging processes not outcomes (ie. tax paid)?
I think that's the core challenge w this. Everyone thinks they know avoidance. But its hard to define (see AMT/ Cafe Nero discussion) Zero tax could be a fair outcome (if making a fair loss). So focus has been on transparency metrics- but that just kicks the can down the road.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The big ask of the FTM is voluntary country-by-country reporting -- which is easy to comply with if you only operate in 1 or 2 countries. So in practice (I think) only one UK firm w international operations (LUSH) has done it so far.
-
FTM have not yet developed a template for foreign owned companies. But underlying assumptions are that transparency provides anyone with enough data they can use to judge if company is paying a fair amount of tax.
- 9 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
giving a kitemark to a company that chooses to publish a doc doesn't seem like a win to me. Zero gain. Doesn't change practices?
-
I agree. Standardising metrics & disclosures can be worthwhile (see
@GRI_Secretariat@CDP@EITIorg@IATI_aid etc...) but misleading to consumers to give a 'fair' kitemark if what is really meant is 'transparent' - 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.