@PaulJMonaghan - can you comment on the directors' loans question? Where does FTM see it in terms of the tax avoidance/fair tax/boring tax planning spectrum?
-
-
Replying to @MForstater @FairTaxMark and
Hi Paul. You commented over the weekend on the tax affairs of a coffee company FTM has not certified, can you comment on this question on a company that has been? -- helpful to clarify what the substantive criteria for 'ok' and 'not ok' is for FTM.
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
No thanks Maya. Am doing my best not to engage with polemics right now. Life"s too short
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
It's a question not a polemic. Seems like a reasonable question for
@FairTaxMark to have a view on. It must have come up in the certification process for@AMTCoffee? Or Technical Committee?@alexcobham @_DavidQuentin@RichardJMurphy1 reply 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @hselftax and
It's a question from a polemicist - someone who regularly rips into NGOs on governance, but has little to say on what's emerging at the IoD. Someone who has the time to critique contributions of the third sector but rarely comments on the misdemenours of the Big Four.
3 replies 1 retweet 0 likes -
Replying to @PaulJMonaghan @MForstater and
That seems unfair to me. Maya works in development so naturally that is the area she engages in. She is often challenging but always polite. Surely you should welcome and engage in genuine debate, even if you don’t happen to like the questioner?
2 replies 1 retweet 9 likes -
Replying to @hselftax @MForstater and
But its not genuine debate Heather. If it was I would engage - within reason. The question is tied up with mean-spirited stuff from a couple of weeks ago that I took issue with. Anyhow, work to do...
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PaulJMonaghan @hselftax and
But the mystery remains - why did Fair Tax Mark okay a company with two significant questions: the director loans and the possible profit-shifting. At this point it looks like you didn't consider these.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @DanNeidle @hselftax and
Spin-off discussions derived from questions from polemicists are covered by non-engage policy. Rest assured we looked at everything covered by our criteria.
3 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @PaulJMonaghan @DanNeidle and
I trust u do look at everything covered by the criteria Paul. Q is whether criteria assess 'fair tax' (not just transparency). Given that the FTM's founder, Board & Technical Committee member has previously denounced AMT style loans as avoidance it seems paradox needing clarity.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like
I guess the answer might be either (A) Its not in the criteria so it wasn't discussed or (B) It was discussed & FTM got comfortable that it wasn't avoidance. Either way it is interesting & useful for users to know - if its A about the scope of FTM, or B for the debate on 'fair'
-
-
Replying to @MForstater @PaulJMonaghan and
The answer we are not going to clarify that because one of the people who raised the question is a mean spirited polemicist (which I'm not) ..... just seems like a weird road to go down.
0 replies 0 retweets 0 likesThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.