This is important. Some Twitter posts (not here) imply that it's a Manichean world - Good v Evil. So if your'e not "with" then you are "against". Must you? I know the analyses that say knowledge is never neutral but T often discusses how we arrive at knowledge, before action.
"What motivates you?" I wrote a personal piece a while back on why I got into the tax debates https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/multinational-tax-dodging-development-corporate-maya-forstater/ … Also my journey so far in @tax_journal recently https://www.taxjournal.com/articles/one-minute-maya-forstater-14022018 … and a piece at @AnticorruptBlog on why the big numbers matterhttps://globalanticorruptionblog.com/2016/03/23/wags-whats-the-harm/ …
-
-
-
So my agenda or motivation is one that wants to share and test our knowledge and understanding so that any actions based on it will work to achieve things like reductions in poverty or inequality, and not fail in practice, or ignore other things that may achieve the same ends.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks Maya- I've found your work super helpful in helping keep a focus on the evidence.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.