All good checks. But how reliable, comprehensive and up to date is matching data likely to be available on an automatic basis, esp cross border?
Shouldn't the UK right hand side box be one step over to the left? i.e. aligned underneath 'name of beneficial owner' rather than 'identity documents'pic.twitter.com/DIqkbwH8NP
-
-
I'm not sure the boxes were intended to be aligned (design is not my forte!) But yes, I guess to follow the diagram's columnar logic (is that a word?) you could move the box to the left, not least to acknowledge that CH requires no ID docs. Thanks!
-
:) Fair enough! Nice diagram otherwise
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Or is there a missing middle box for the "name" ?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
And v clearly some controls much better than none.
I was just picking up on the idea automated checking was feasible and perhaps straightforward.
These sort of things are perhaps called validations? Like DoB can't have 17xx.