These conclusions ignore the mountain of evidence that, in the absence of hard law that addresses cross-border HR violations, victims of violations have significant difficulty accessing a legal remedy. This is striking given that access to a *legal* remedy is one of the (1)
Cross border corporate responsibility: Do voluntary standards or hard law work better? asks @nieuwenkamp_csr @ihrb https://www.ihrb.org/other/governments-role/commentary-evidence-base-policies-corporate-responsibility#.WmsvhhXgaJY.twitter … A: we have no clue. The trick is not for 'believers' & 'non believers' to battle, but to create pathways to test & evolve
-
-
-
key pillars of the Guiding Principles on B&HR and yet corporations routinely use the corporate form and jurisdictional arguments to evade legal accountability for cross-border violations. That's why groups & institutions that have been working with the victims of corporate (2)
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.