Politically, the combination approach allowed a mobilisation of policymakers and civil society (especially across Africa) that was broad and powerful - and a big part of the reason for the SDG target.
-
But that said, the introduction is equally open to evidenced suggestions, contributions. I don't expect consensus, and as you say our views are well known, but the process should strengthen the analysis. All welcome!
There is a difference though between saying that you don't expect consensus in a collaborative process, than saying at the outset that some views are illegitimate
-
-
Please don't misrepresent this. We're inviting comment, critique, contribution on draft chapters. Naturally these express views. (In the past, we have also expressed views.) We are deliberately seeking contributions from many competing views in many areas. These are very welcome.
-
I am glad this project is taking place, and clearly part of the point of such discussions is that views can change. In June you (TJN/GATJ) said that there could be no legitimate question over whether the agreed SDG goal on IFFs included tax avoidance - is that still the position?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.