Well I'm fundamentally asking a question: what is the benefit of putting them together? And apologies but unfortunately the day job means I don't have time to write anything more coherent than 280 characters here and there.
-
-
Would be great to have an answer to that. I see no benefit from running the different issues together, and a number of serious disadvantages.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @DanNeidle @TaxJusticeNet
In terms of the book, it doesn't make sense to unpick the UN process. I might have written the SDGs differently but we are where we are. On the substance of having an umbrella term, there are pros and cons...
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
Politically, the combination approach allowed a mobilisation of policymakers and civil society (especially across Africa) that was broad and powerful - and a big part of the reason for the SDG target.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
On the downside, the umbrella term is to a degree responsible for the initial UN system view that a single indicator for 16.4 could do the job - which I think we will be able to get beyond, but hasn't helped the early analysis.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Alex we've been here before but the UN says that there is no agreed definition and no resolution on this specific point https://developmentfinance.un.org/illicit-financial-flows …pic.twitter.com/GiXNzRnkQG
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @MForstater @alexcobham and
@TaxJusticeNet@GA4TJ &@icrict are say that their preferred definition was agreed in the SDGs and there can be no legitimate question on the matter https://www.taxjustice.net/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/Letter-UNSG-Jun17.pdf …pic.twitter.com/IXwXt8mTXO
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
-
Replying to @DanNeidle @alexcobham and
UN World Bank IMF interagency task force 20 page report says it's unclear. http://www.un.org/esa/ffd/wp-content/uploads/2017/02/Illicit-financial-flows-conceptual-paper_FfDO-working-paper.pdf … I really don't think there's a global/UN consensus on this that can't be unpicked
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @MForstater @DanNeidle and
I'd very much welcome your making the case at github that the definition is unclear, or other than proposed in the draft.
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes
I'm not sure how I feel about this. How can I (or anyone) be welcome to make this case if the project's organisers have already declared that there is *no legitimate question* that can be raised on this point?
-
-
Replying to @MForstater @DanNeidle and
The collaborative aspect is focused on, and exciting (to me) for the potential to strengthen the technical evaluation of methodologies and data, so that's where I really hope people will contribute most. But...
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @alexcobham @MForstater and
But that said, the introduction is equally open to evidenced suggestions, contributions. I don't expect consensus, and as you say our views are well known, but the process should strengthen the analysis. All welcome!
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes - 5 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.