a minor disagreement with my esteemed colleague @MForstater on whether (and how) a BEPs indicator should be bundled under illicit flows in the SDGs: http://disq.us/p/1opj21q
-
-
Replying to @CarterPaddy @MForstater
So is your last argument basically that it doesn't matter if the IFF indicator includes tax avoidance because no one pays any attention to the SDGs anyway?
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @aidthoughts @MForstater
More that things which need addressing separately can be addressed separately even if under the name heading in an org chart.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @CarterPaddy @MForstater
Think the worry is that the indicator becomes the definition, and the sort of conflation that keeps Maya up at night becomes even worse. Another concern is whether two-sub indicators can be designed in a way that cleanly identifies them separately
2 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Yes that! But also the practical worry that putting corruption, crime, money laundering, illicit trade together with BEPS does not make a coherent topic (i.e. the org chart matters)
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.